![[Electrical Ground symbol]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEge9gAmzyYTUuSYpd7VwK6D6lppUBAr8wW5d52sUwUyC8FWcRAEz00dj_vGvcgimwzHXR6RL_xL1ToCBsz1q54NEb5MLtbBxDYhrLv3buH4vo2iZxBBDnCCbrVuKK0nwwkAHeSPN0rp80g/s1600/clipart1310127-yellow%2528200x200%2529.png)
“a ‘ground’ is usually idealized as an infinite source or sink for charge, which can absorb an unlimited amount of current without changing its potential”
— Wikipedia
Ground (electricity)
There is a notion in electronic circuits of something called a “ground.” It takes its names from the ground we walk on,
and the idea is basically that the ground, really the Earth itself, is so incredibly big that it contains an infinite number
of electrons, the “stuff” of electricity. So if we ever need a source to draw electrons from, we can get them from the ground.
If we ever need to get rid of some electrons, we can just pump them back into the ground.
It's for this reason that we have a “ground” pin in our electrical outlets,
in hopes that rogue flows of electricity will make a beeline for the ground rather than flowing through our bodies.
Plenty of room for more electrons in the ground.
What We Hold to Account
Another way of thinking about “ground” is to say it's something we don't have to account for.
Consider, for example, a tool for keeping track of your finances.
Such programs keep track of several kinds of entities, but among them are typically things usually called something like an “income source” and an “expense category.”
An income source is as a place from which income arrives.
When you say your employer is the source of your income, that's really all you need to know. It's not really consequential where
the employer got the money. If you had to track such things, there would be no end to it. They might have gotten it from someone else.
But where did they get it? It goes on and on.
Expenses are the same way. You pick an expense category like food and you tell the program you spent $20 on food.
It doesn't really care what the food place did with the money. As far as it's concerned, you can spend as much as you want and that's
the end of it. All gone into who-knows-where.
The point of an income source in an accounting program is to be an infinite source of money, a ground.
The point of an expense category is to be an infinite sink of money, something to pour money down, again a ground.
We think of these as ways of accounting for stuff, but really they are ways of not accounting for things.
Out of sight, out of mind. That's what grounds are for. They are a way of notating the idea that beyond this point, we just don't care.
“Europe was hitting up against nature's limits.
They'd overfished their rivers, felled their great forests,
and hunted their big game.
When European conquerors stumbled upon the so-called New World,
they thought they'd hit the jackpot.
They saw in the Americas a kind of supersized Europe
that would never run out of fish, trees, gold, fur, or any of that bounty.
…
The official story of our countries is a story of endless nature,
wilderness to be devoured without limits.”
—Naomi Klein
Infinite Self-Deception
Naomi Klein's excellent and insightful video “What's In a (Trump) Straw?”
makes the important observation that people have been used to thinking about the world as infinite, when really it is not.
In this case, it's not electrons we're talking about, however.
In her conceptualization, there is a kind of rough analog of income sources—the bounties we draw from the earth:
fish and game, trees, and so on.
And there is also an analog of expense categories—the various kinds of pollution we give Mother Earth in return:
sewage, plastics, and air pollution of various kinds.
Stuff we never previously had to account for, because we had a belief that the world was so infinitely large that it would
supply us with as much as we needed of whatever we wanted. And we deceived ourselves into believing it would gracefully accept in return
as much crap, both literally and figuratively, as we wanted to throw back at it in return.
Shocking, But True
The Earth is still big enough that we haven't used up its capacity to act as an electrical ground.
But it is not big enough that we can pretend there are infinite trees to cut down, infinite fish to catch, or
that there is infinite capacity to spill oil into the oceans or pump smoke from fossil fuels into the air.
![[Electrical Ground symbol]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZ1qCNaw5LJ_skR09QzNotTT0ZWeC6dTFbBxc808os68zJ2cZwo8hVbsier65iWS6oWHoviBx4U2mhrsZbBsYrjm1BfHydHzEVZM0oFg4FjwJyHx6Oq2UKXcHmtQCQB_xv5f-4eogHXfI/s1600/clipart1310127-yellow%2528200x200%2529-no.png)
As population has grown, we've reached our limits. We should have been paying better attention.
But at this point, the pleasant fiction offered by the “ground” metaphor, that there's some point in the world beyond which
we don't have to account for these things, that things can be thought to go into or come from the ground as if by magic,
is long past.
Nature is holding us to account.
We must start caring about population growth and resource use. We should have been doing that all along.
It's going to be a big change. It's not something we're used to doing.
But there is no alternative.
We keep making more people, but we aren't making more planet and we're using up the one we have. That's a bad recipe.
If we're going to survive, we need to get these things into balance.
If you got value from this post, please “share” it.
If you're looking for further reading, I highly recommend Naomi Klein's new book, On Fire.
